It is important to note that past results are not necessarily indicative of future results and that outcomes will vary according to the facts in individual cases.
R. v. A.E.
Three individuals attended at a party and held up the people there. The people were robbed of their money and jewellery. It was alleged that A.E. was one of the three individuals and he was charged with Robbery with a Firearm, Disguise with Intent, Point Firearm and several other offences. The sole issue in this case was the identity of the “robbers”.
Result: Client found “not guilty” of all charges by jury.
R. v. L.G.
It was alleged that the client and others approached an individual at a mall and robbed him of his property. It was also alleged that weapons were involved. Client’s position was that he was not involved.
Result: Found “not guilty” of all charges after trial.
R. v. A.F.
Client charged with Robbery and Fail to Comply with Probation. It was alleged that the client and others robbed and beat a man in an apartment lobby. The robbery was captured on video. Despite this, client claimed he was not involved.
Result: Client discharged after preliminary hearing.
R. v. A.M.
Client charged with Robbery and Possession of Prohibited Weapon. It was alleged that while at school, the client cornered the complainant in the stairwell, brandished a knife, and took the complainant’s property.
Result: Charges withdrawn after discussions with the Crown Attorney.
R. v. R.P.
Client charged with a “home invasion” (Robbery with a Firearm, Break and Enter, Possession of a Firearm; sawed off shotgun). It was alleged that the client broke into a home and robbed the owner. Police were called and allegedly found the client in possession of a sawed off shotgun. It was alleged that the client’s Charter rights were violated.
Result: All charges stayed by a judge at the Superior Court of Justice.
R. v. S.A.
Client charged with two counts of Robbery with a Firearm, Disguise with Intent and various other firearm related offences. It was alleged that when the police attended at the client’s home to arrest him, a firearm was found.
Result: Client found “not guilty” of all charges after trial.
R. v. A.M.
Client charged with Robbery, Forcible Confinement, Assault, and Use Firearm in the Commission of an Offence. It was alleged that this was a “home invasion” where client and another male entered into a home and taped up the individuals and robbed them.
Result: All charges stayed after a contested preliminary hearing.
R. v. B.G.
Client charged with Robbery. Client allegedly robbed the complainant and fought the complainant when there was an attempt to recover the money.
Result: Charge withdrawn.
R. v. M.O.
Client charged with Robbery, Forcible Entry, Break and Enter with Intent, Assault. Client charged after he allegedly broke into the complainant’s home and pulled out a firearm. Complainant alleged that he was beaten as client stole his property.
Result: Charges withdrawn by Crown Attorney.
R. v. A.M.
Client charged with Robbery. A courier dropped off a package at the client’s home and claimed that the client robbed her at that time. The client adamantly denied this.
Result: Charge withdrawn after discussions with the Crown Attorney
Contact us to if you are charged in robbery case and looking for expert legal help in Toronto
